Apple is preparing to debut its first foldable smartphone, the iPhone Ultra, with leaked visuals suggesting a design that merges dual screens into a single device. The upcoming model features a 5.5-inch cover display and a larger 7.8-inch inner OLED screen, offering a distinct form factor compared to current iPhone models. Apple is reportedly entering the foldable device market with a design that aligns with its established visual style.

Leaked visuals reveal dual screens, A20 Pro chipset, and titanium build for the upcoming foldable device.
The internal architecture of the iPhone Ultra reportedly relies on the new A20 Pro chipset manufactured using TSMC’s 2nm process technology. This advanced silicon is paired with 12GB of RAM to support multitasking and intensive workloads. The device also reintroduces a side-mounted Touch ID sensor, bringing back fingerprint authentication to the iPhone lineup after years of relying solely on FaceID.
- Cover Display Size: 5.5-inch
- Inner Display Size: 7.8-inch OLED
- Chipset: A20 Pro (TSMC’s 2nm process)
- RAM: 12GB
- Biometrics: Side-mounted Touch ID
Build quality appears prioritized in the leaked design, which utilizes a titanium and aluminum frame for structural integrity. Apple is reportedly implementing a “crease-free” hinge mechanism intended to eliminate visible folding lines on the inner display. The exterior finish is expected to stick to traditional colors like space gray/black and silver/white rather than vibrant hues.
Pricing for the iPhone Ultra is projected to start at 2,000 USD (about $2,000), positioning it as a premium device in Apple’s portfolio. The smartphone is expected to launch in September 2026, potentially with a staggered rollout across different regions.
Early leaked images indicate the current prototype is a low-quality replica featuring an iPhone Air-like camera plateau that appears glued onto the back of the dummy unit. These initial visuals suggest Apple’s final design may differ significantly from what has been shown so far.
Source: NotebookCheck




Discussion
0 comments