GAMES Blood of Dawnwalker Xanthe Lantern Puzzle Solution GAMES Ikea Kallax Shelf Teased for Skyrim Merch Drop in UK and Ireland NINTENDO SWITCH 2 Maneater 2 Announced for 2027 Launch on Switch 2, PS5, and PC CONSOLES Square Enix TGS 2026 Lineup Features Dragon Quest VII and Kingdom Hearts IV PLAYSTATION 5 Konami Rhapsody in Scarlet Announced for PS5, Xbox Series, and PC GAMES Naughty Dog Confirms The Last of Us Franchise Is Not Done AMD NBA 2K27 DLSS 5 Benchmarks Show 60% Performance Hit on RTX 5090 GAMES FromSoftware Avoids Fixed Game Formula, Miyazaki Says Fresh Ideas Rule ACCESSORIES Sony GTA 6 DualSense Controllers Launch November 19 for $85 CONSOLES Final Fantasy Resonance Brings HD-2D to PS5, Xbox, Switch 2, PC NINTENDO SWITCH 2 Maneater 2 Announced for PS5, Xbox Series, Switch 2, and PC GAMES Arma Reforger Update 1.080.013 Fixes Crashes and Visual Glitches PLAYSTATION 5 GTA 6 Netflix Deep Dive Drives 33% PS5 and 34% Xbox Sales in UK PLAYSTATION 5 Konami’s Rev. NOiR RPG Confirmed for PlayStation 5 in 2027

Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron sued for DRAM price-fixing

Lena Fischer 2 min read

A class action lawsuit accuses Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron of DRAM price- fixing and supply manipulation, linking chip shortages to rising console and PC prices.

Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron sued for DRAM price-fixing
CONSOLES

A class action lawsuit accuses Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron of coordinating to manipulate the global DRAM market. This legal action directly impacts buyers who are already seeing higher prices for gaming consoles and personal computers. The complaint argues that the manufacturers restricted the supply of standard memory chips to force consumers toward more expensive alternatives.

Lawsuit alleges memory chipmakers cut supply to drive up costs

The lawsuit targets the three major DRAM producers for allegedly fixing prices and controlling supply chains. It claims the companies simultaneously cut production of DDR3 and DDR4 memory while pivoting their factories to produce high-bandwidth memory for artificial intelligence datacenters. This strategic shift locked up conventional DRAM supply and allowed the firms to charge significantly higher prices for the remaining stock.

The legal complaint cites a historical precedent to support its claims of anti-competitive behavior. It references a 2005 case where Samsung and SK Hynix paid substantial fines for engaging in similar DRAM price-fixing conspiracies. The current suit alleges that the industry has returned to these same practices with greater scale and speed, driving up costs for hardware manufacturers.

The financial impact of these alleged practices is visible in recent pricing decisions by major hardware brands. Microsoft recently raised the price of its Xbox consoles by $100 to $150, explicitly citing that memory and storage costs had increased by more than 2.5 times. Apple, , Sony, and have also increased their hardware prices recently due to similar supply chain pressures and component cost increases.

The lawsuit seeks to hold the memory manufacturers accountable for the rapid and significant rise in consumer hardware costs. It argues that the coordinated reduction in DDR3 and DDR4 supply was a deliberate strategy to maximize profits at the expense of the market. The case highlights the ongoing tension between component suppliers and the hardware companies that rely on them.

Source: VideoGameChronicles