ANDROID Vivo V70 Lite 4G Adds 8,100mAh Battery, Drops 5G for Unisoc Chip STEAM Phantom Blade Zero Pre-Orders Hit 300K, Chasing Black Myth: Wukong INTEL Asus CX9406 Googlebook Leak: Panther Lake CPU, 16GB RAM, $1,383 Price GAMES GTA 6 Leaked Footage Shows Driving and Strip Club Scenes CONSOLES The Duskbloods Switch 2 Input Lag Hits 200ms in Network Test PC HARDWARE Philips Evnia 27-inch 260Hz Monitor Launches for $190 GAMES GTA 6 Leaks Hit Rockstar Morale, Netflix Unfazed by Early Footage AMD AMD Desktop CPU Share Hits 34.9% in Q2 2026 as Intel Loses Ground GAMES WWE 2K26 Patch 1.15 Adds Finn Balor Theme and Fixes Match Bugs NVIDIA Modern Warfare 4 Beta Nerfs Frangible Rounds and Footsteps GAMES Modern Warfare 4 Beta Patch Tweaks TTK and Footstep Audio SOFTWARE AND UPDATES Twitch Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Unlicensed AI Training INTEL Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 7 Launches with Wi-Fi 7 and Core Ultra 3 for $1,109 STEAM Settler’s Domain Launches on Steam With Native ARM Support

Anthropic Faces Class Action Over Claude Usage Limit Disclosures

Lena Fischer 2 min read

Anthropic is sued for allegedly misleading Claude subscribers about usage limits on Max 5x and Max 20x plans, with actual session caps far below advertised multipliers.

Anthropic Faces Class Action Over Claude Usage Limit Disclosures
SOFTWARE AND UPDATES

Anthropic faces a class-action lawsuit over how it communicates Claude usage limits to subscribers. The suit alleges the company misled customers about the actual session caps on its Max 5x and Max 20x plans. Plaintiff Karl Khan claims the advertised multipliers do not match real-world performance.

Plaintiff says Max 20x plan delivers only six to eight times Pro usage

The lawsuit targets Anthropic's Claude AI assistant and its paid subscription tiers. The Max 20x plan promises twenty times the usage of the Pro plan, but Khan says the actual limit is closer to six to eight times. The Max 5x plan delivers roughly three-and-a-half times Pro usage, according to the complaint.

Khan describes Anthropic's website as a black box that offers no meaningful explanation of how usage is calculated. The company provides best practices for reducing usage but does not define what constitutes a single session. This lack of transparency is at the heart of the legal challenge.

The case was filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. It seeks class-action status on behalf of subscribers who paid for higher-tier plans. The lawsuit's outcome may influence how AI companies disclose service limits in the future.

Source: TweakTown