ACCESSORIES Godox A2 brings 1/8,000s sync xenon flash to iPhones for around $85 AMD Lenovo ThinkCentre M75t Gen 6 adds Radeon RX 6400 graphics in Eurozone, UK, and Singapore GAMES Arkham Horror The Card Game Second Season Gets Blood Token Mechanics in New Russia-Exclusive Campaign DLSS Super Meat Boy 3D update adds DLSS and FSR support alongside crossover character GAMES Mass Effect Legendary Edition multiplayer restored by community mod with 66 characters and 19 maps INTEL Xiaomi Redmi Book 16 2027 swaps Core Ultra for Wildcat Lake Core 5 320 for better battery life ACCESSORIES WALLHACK SP-005 Berserk glass mousepad launches worldwide for $139 GAMES Cosplayer Maria Davydova Brings Baldur’s Gate 3’s Dark Urge to Life in Dark Fantasy Photoshoot STEAM Cleaner Company launches January 26 with four-player co-op sci-fi cleaning chaos STEAM Taskey’s Midnight Toybox turns a child’s bedroom into a deadly board game GAMES The FINALS update makes the announcer call out your actual player name AYN ODIN Ayn Odin 3 Portal handheld features 9,000mAh battery and Snapdragon Q8 for extended emulation PLAYSTATION 5 Saros adds New Game Plus and Boss Rush modes in free Zenith Update GAMES Rockstar trial ends day before GTA VI launch as union accuses studio of hiring informants

Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron sued for DRAM price-fixing

Lena Fischer 2 min read

A class action lawsuit accuses Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron of DRAM price- fixing and supply manipulation, linking chip shortages to rising console and PC prices.

Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron sued for DRAM price-fixing
CONSOLES

A class action lawsuit accuses Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron of coordinating to manipulate the global DRAM market. This legal action directly impacts buyers who are already seeing higher prices for gaming consoles and personal computers. The complaint argues that the manufacturers restricted the supply of standard memory chips to force consumers toward more expensive alternatives.

Lawsuit alleges memory chipmakers cut supply to drive up costs

The lawsuit targets the three major DRAM producers for allegedly fixing prices and controlling supply chains. It claims the companies simultaneously cut production of DDR3 and DDR4 memory while pivoting their factories to produce high-bandwidth memory for artificial intelligence datacenters. This strategic shift locked up conventional DRAM supply and allowed the firms to charge significantly higher prices for the remaining stock.

The legal complaint cites a historical precedent to support its claims of anti-competitive behavior. It references a 2005 case where Samsung and SK Hynix paid substantial fines for engaging in similar DRAM price-fixing conspiracies. The current suit alleges that the industry has returned to these same practices with greater scale and speed, driving up costs for hardware manufacturers.

The financial impact of these alleged practices is visible in recent pricing decisions by major hardware brands. Microsoft recently raised the price of its Xbox consoles by $100 to $150, explicitly citing that memory and storage costs had increased by more than 2.5 times. Apple, , Sony, and have also increased their hardware prices recently due to similar supply chain pressures and component cost increases.

The lawsuit seeks to hold the memory manufacturers accountable for the rapid and significant rise in consumer hardware costs. It argues that the coordinated reduction in DDR3 and DDR4 supply was a deliberate strategy to maximize profits at the expense of the market. The case highlights the ongoing tension between component suppliers and the hardware companies that rely on them.

Source: VideoGameChronicles