ACCESSORIES Godox A2 brings 1/8,000s sync xenon flash to iPhones for around $85 AMD Lenovo ThinkCentre M75t Gen 6 adds Radeon RX 6400 graphics in Eurozone, UK, and Singapore GAMES Arkham Horror The Card Game Second Season Gets Blood Token Mechanics in New Russia-Exclusive Campaign DLSS Super Meat Boy 3D update adds DLSS and FSR support alongside crossover character GAMES Mass Effect Legendary Edition multiplayer restored by community mod with 66 characters and 19 maps INTEL Xiaomi Redmi Book 16 2027 swaps Core Ultra for Wildcat Lake Core 5 320 for better battery life ACCESSORIES WALLHACK SP-005 Berserk glass mousepad launches worldwide for $139 GAMES Cosplayer Maria Davydova Brings Baldur’s Gate 3’s Dark Urge to Life in Dark Fantasy Photoshoot STEAM Cleaner Company launches January 26 with four-player co-op sci-fi cleaning chaos STEAM Taskey’s Midnight Toybox turns a child’s bedroom into a deadly board game GAMES The FINALS update makes the announcer call out your actual player name AYN ODIN Ayn Odin 3 Portal handheld features 9,000mAh battery and Snapdragon Q8 for extended emulation PLAYSTATION 5 Saros adds New Game Plus and Boss Rush modes in free Zenith Update GAMES Rockstar trial ends day before GTA VI launch as union accuses studio of hiring informants

Vivo X300 Ultra Camera Test Results Place It Third in DxOMark Rankings

Owen Carter 2 min read

The Vivo X300 Ultra ranks third in DxOMark's latest smartphone camera tests, trailing the Vivo X300 Pro by one point due to main camera video losses and low light artifacts.

Vivo has updated its flagship smartphone lineup with the X300 Ultra, which has now been evaluated by DxOMark for camera performance. The device entered the ranking in third place behind two other recent flagships.

DxOMark camera test results reveal the Vivo X300 Ultra falls short of its Pro sibling due to video recording deficits and low light performance issues.

The Vivo X300 Pro holds the top spot overall, leading the Ultra model by a single point in the combined scoring system used by the lab. The small difference shows that both phones have similar camera abilities even though they target different market segments.

Most of this single point difference comes from how well each phone records video with its main lens. The X300 Ultra lost ten points compared to its Pro sibling when tested for main-camera video recording, which dragged down its overall score and dropped it below the Pro model in the final ranking.

Beyond the raw scores, reviewers noted specific quality issues during low-light shooting with the Ultra. They reported inconsistent frame handling, higher noise levels, visible artifacts, and AI processing that sometimes produced unnatural textures in dark scenes.

Pricing details for the X300 Ultra remain limited to a relative comparison rather than an exact launch cost. The device is expected to retail around €600 more expensive than last year's Pro model, which translates to approximately $699 at current exchange rates.

In terms of hardware quality, the Vivo X300 Ultra is positioned above the base model but below the premium X300 Pro version. DxOMark's latest test places it firmly behind both its predecessor and the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra, which currently leads the smartphone camera rankings.

Source: NotebookCheck